Daniel Pearl murder case: SC allows Omar Saeed Sheikh to be moved to Lahore’s Kot Lakhpat jail

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed government authorities to move Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, who was on death row for 18 years before his acquittal in the 2002 beheading of American journalist Daniel Pearl, to the Kot Lakhpat jail in Lahore.

A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, issued the order while hearing a petition filed by Sheikh, a British national of Pakistani heritage, against his continued detention.

During the hearing, Punjab Additional Advocate-General Faisal Chaudhry informed the court that Sheikh had submitted an application seeking his transfer from Karachi to Lahore, where his family resided. Earlier this week, a Punjab Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) spokesperson had said that Sheikh had been shifted from Karachi to Lahore due to “security concerns”.

Justice Bandial suggested that Sheikh could be moved to a GOR (Government Officers Residences) colony, which was a high-security area, directing the Punjab government to facilitate Sheikh in accordance with court orders.

“We are not satisfied with the continuous detention of this person,” the judge remarked, according to AFP.

“The detainee Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh shall be accommodated in a government building in which officers of jail reside.”

Chaudhry, the Punjab government counsel, informed the court that it had been decided to keep Sheikh in a colony of prison staff within the premises of Kot Lakhpat jail, and sought time for the transfer. He said Rangers and police personnel would have to be deployed if he was detained outside the jail.

At this, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah inquired why the government was seeking time if Sheikh was to be kept within the limits of the jail.

Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Khalid Jawed Khan assured the court that Sheikh would be transferred to the Lahore prison within a week.

The lawyer for Sheikh objected to the proposal, saying being held in the prison staff colony was akin to being detained in the jail and would hinder movement. However, the objection was overruled.

At the last hearing of the case on Feb 2, 2021, the Supreme Court had ordered authorities to move Sheikh from his death cell at the Karachi Central Prison to a government rest house with the provision of facilities for a normal life, albeit without access to the outside world through telephone, internet, etc.

The directives were issued after Attorney General Khan and Sindh Advocate General Salman Talibuddin had expressed concern that if Sheikh was released, he would either be taken away or may disappear.

During today’s hearing, the counsel for the men earlier convicted in the case informed the court that Sheikh Muhammad Adil, another former accused, was ill and needed treatment.

The court directed authorities to provide all necessary medical facilities to Adil. It also ordered the federal and provincial governments to submit reports of implementation of its orders in the court chambers.

The hearing of the case was adjourned for two weeks, while the court directed the Punjab chief secretary to appear at the next hearing.

On January 28, the Supreme Court — by a majority of two to one — had upheld the Sindh High Court’s (SHC) acquittal of Sheikh and ordered his release if he was not wanted in any other case.

The court had also directed that all the other accused — Fahad Nasim Ahmed, Syed Salman Saqib and Adil be released forthwith unless they were wanted in any other case.

The Sindh government and parents of the slain journalist had appealed the high court’s decision, but the apex court upheld the acquittal order.

Pearl’s murder and legal action

Wall Street Journal journalist Pearl, 38, was doing research on religious extremism in Karachi when he was abducted in January 2002. A graphic video showing his decapitation was delivered to the US consulate a month later. Subsequently, Sheikh was arrested in 2002 and sentenced to death by a trial court.

In its April 2, 2020, order, the SHC had overturned Sheikh’s conviction for Pearl’s murder but maintained his conviction on a lesser charge of abetting the kidnapping, for which he was sentenced to seven years in prison.

As Sheikh had been incarcerated since 2002, that sentence was counted as time already served by the high court. The SHC had also acquitted three other men who had earlier been sentenced to life imprisonment by a Karachi anti-terrorism court.

After their acquittal order, the provincial government placed them in 90-day detention under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance, saying their release posed a threat to security.

On July 1, a fresh notification under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, extended their detention by three months, which was later extended by another 90 days.

But in December, the high court accepted a petition by the men against their continued detention and ordered their immediate release, declaring all notifications of the Sindh government related to their detention “null and void”.

Following the SHC’s order to release the four men, the Sindh government had filed an appeal with the Supreme Court seeking to keep them incarcerated, citing threats to national security if they were to walk free.

Newspaper: Dawn, The News, Express Tribune, The Nation, Business Recorder

IHC suspends FIA’s summon to Absar Alam

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), on Monday, suspended a summon issued by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to the former chairman Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), Absar Alam.

A single bench of Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the petition of the former chairman PEMRA, and also summoned the investigation officer of the FIA to appear in person before the court on the next hearing.

The IHC bench also issued notices to the Secretary Interior, the Director General (DG) Federal Investigation Agency, and directed them to submit their reply in this matter. Later, the court deferred the hearing till April 7th.

Absar Alam has filed the petition in the IHC under Article 199 of the Constitution through his counsel Sajid Tanoli.

In his petition, the senior journalist and former chairman PEMRA has challenged the summons issued to him by the FIA over his recent tweets and social media posts.

The FIA had summoned him on a complaint filed by a lawyer who accused him of anti-state rhetoric.

Absar, however, challenged the summons and contended that the FIA summoned him without providing details of the complaint.

He said that the summons were issued even after the date on which he was supposed to appear before the investigation officer.

He termed the summon mala fide and requested the court to declare it as illegal and unlawful.

He also prayed before the court to direct the FIA not to harass, humiliate, threat or arrest him in connection with the complaint lodged by a lawyer with the investigative agency.

The Cyber Crime Reporting Centre of the FIA had issued notice to the former chairman PEMRA regarding a complaint that he had uploaded defamatory tweets against the State individuals, and departments through his Twitter account.

The former chairman adopted that he highlighted human rights violations through his Twitter handle and tried to defend the aggrieved and deprived segments of the society, and also for the supremacy of the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

He argued that through notices, the respondents were trying to harass, humiliate, blackmail, and arrest him illegally, unlawfully, without due process of law, and that the same was part of the campaign of silencing sane voices.

He informed the court that time and again, he requested the SHO to provide him a copy of complaint, evidence, and material, if any, so that he may furnish his defense but the SHO flatly refused to provide any document to him.—TERENCE J SIGAMONY

Newspaper: Business Recorder

Pakistan Resolution and freedom of speech

Pakistan Resolution was a culmination of several years of struggle for freedom. Striving for independent states, the Resolution of 23rd March 1940 called for the provision of rights of minorities in the subcontinent. By its very essence, this landmark document makes a case for civil liberties. This concise document clearly chalks out the need for constitutional rights of “Mussalmans” and “other minorities” in India. Freedom of expression is, therefore, enshrined in the spirit of the Lahore Resolution or the Pakistan Resolution, as it was called later.

The last section of the Resolution states: “the adequate, effective and mandatory safeguards should be specifically provided in the constitution for minorities.” The minorities at that time included Muslims. These safeguards were to ensure the protection of “religious, cultural, economic, political, administrative and other rights and interests” of Muslims and other minorities. Going by the aforementioned excerpts, it becomes evident that the right to freedom of speech can be derived from the Pakistan Resolution.

Pakistan Resolution was a precursor to the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan and the essential freedoms mentioned in the Resolution have been translated into the Constitution. Regarding freedom of speech and expression, Article 19 of the Constitution provides the right to freedom of speech and the protection of that right. The roots of this Article can be traced to the freedom movement and Pakistan Resolution. According to the Article 19, every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression. It also guarantees freedom of press and media.

It is important to understand the context of the Resolution and the events preceding the All-India Muslim League general session held on March 22-24, 1940. The rights and liberties of Muslims were suppressed by the Hindu majority as well as the British rule. Being a minority, Muslims were oppressed in cultural, political, economic and administrative fields of life. Freedom, liberty, and independence were the demands of Muslims as they fought for their rights. It is only with the freedom of expression that the oppressed can raise the voice of dissent against the oppressors. As such, the freedom movement and the ensuing Lahore Resolution have the freedom of speech, expression, and the right to dissent at their very core.

Since the inception of Pakistan, freedom of speech and press have been stifled at many times. In opposition to the spirit of the Resolution, there has been a struggle for the freedom of expression in Pakistan over the years.  During the 72 years of Pakistan’s existence, whether it be democracy or dictatorship, the voice of dissent has often been suppressed. In contrast to the Resolution that called for individual and civil liberties, and freedom of speech being an essential liberty, toleration of difference of opinion has been remarkably low.

Pakistan has constantly ranked low on various freedom indexes and reports. As per the 2019 report on freedom of expression and press by the Reporters Sans Frontiers or Reporters Without Borders (RSF), Pakistan ranks at 142 out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index. Pakistan was on the 139th position in 2018 but the ranking deteriorated in 2019. According to the organisation, the intervention of military in media as the electoral process took place was against independent journalism. Various other independent sources and non-profit organizations have also highlighted the hurdles and challenges to the freedom of expression. Considering the very roots of this nation and going back to the Pakistan Resolution, one finds such restrictions in contradiction to the freedoms the founding fathers fought for.

In Pakistan, freedom of speech remains a constant target by the rulers. According to the Human Rights Watch World Report 2019, the government continues to stifle dissenting voices in non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Furthermore, the report also indicates that militants and interest groups are also a threat to freedom of expression. Various bloggers, journalists, and proponents of free speech have been targeted in Pakistan and these human rights violations have been well documented. Such acts are in direct opposition to the freedoms enshrined in the Pakistan Resolution and the Constitution of Pakistan.

Given the challenges to the freedom of speech and expression, the Pakistan Resolution can indeed serve as a blueprint. The minority groups and those on the periphery should be allowed a voice in society. The founders of this nation fought for the rights and freedoms of minorities of that time and that is reflected in the basic documents and pre-independence speeches of leaders like Quaid-i-Azam.

Over the last couple of decades, the situation regarding freedom of speech and expression has certainly improved in Pakistan. That being said, some obstacles to the freedom of speech are still very much present. We can take a leaf out of Pakistan Resolution and the pre-Independence ideas of great founders of Pakistan and work on the provision of rights to free speech. Pakistan Resolution is a landmark document that is relevant even today and makes a cogent argument regarding liberty and independence.

Newspaper: The News (Writer: Umer Akhtar)

Man acquitted in Pearl case moved to Lahore safe house

LAHORE: A Pakistani-British man who was on death row for 18 years before his acquittal in the 2002 beheading of American journalist Daniel Pearl was transferred on Monday to a government safe house for security reasons, police said.

Ahmad Omar Saeed Sheikh was handed over to the Punjab Counter-Terrorism department amid tight security, a senior police officer, Suhail Sukhera told The Associated Press.

Sheikh was moved to his home city of Lahore from Karachi. Sukhera provided no further details and only said Sheikh was being kept at a well-guarded place.

Sheikh was acquitted by the Sindh High Court in April 2020 and since then Pearl’s family and the government have been fighting a legal battle to overturn the acquittal. Washington has also expressed concern over the acquittal.

Sheikh has been in custody despite his acquittal under a special law allowing the government to detain people deemed a security risk.

The transfer comes more than a month after the Supreme Court ordered Sheikh moved to a safe house from a special jail cell for inmates sentenced to death.

Authorities say Sheikh will not be allowed to leave the safe house.

Pearl disappeared on Jan 23, 2002, in Karachi where he was investigating links between militant groups and Richard C. Reid, dubbed the shoe bomber. Reid had attempted to blow up a flight from Paris to Miami with explosives hidden in his shoes. Sheikh was convicted of helping lure Pearl to a meeting in Karachi, during which he was kidnapped.

Pearl’s body was discovered in a shallow grave soon after a video of his beheading was delivered to the US Consulate in Karachi. The Pentagon in 2007 released a transcript in which Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, said he had killed Pearl.

Newspaper: Dawn , The News

PFUJ slams anti-terrorism cases against journalists by Sindh Police

KARACHI: The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) has expressed serious concern over registration of cases under the Anti-Terrorism Act against journalists, protesting against the alleged extrajudicial killing of a varsity student, Irfan Jatoi, and condemned the murder of private new channel’s journalist, Ajay Laalwani, both of which happened in Sukkur.

The PFUJ termed the registration of Anti-Terrorism Act cases against journalists, writers and political workers protesting against the alleged extrajudicial killing of Irfan Jatoi in jurisdiction of Sukkur’s SITE Area Police Station, as unprecedented and uncalled for. They also described it as the failure of the elected government to provide protection to the civil society especially journalists.

The PFUJ President, Shehzada Zulfiqar and Secretary General Nasir Zaidi in a statement said that the Pakistan Peoples Party government which claims to be people friendly has registered cases against protesting members of the civil society demanding the arrest of killers of an innocent student of the Sindh University.

It demanded the Sindh government and the PPP central leadership to look into the situation and direct the IG Sindh to immediately withdraw cases against journalists, writers and political workers and hold impartial inquiry into the student’s murder.

Meanwhile, the PFUJ also strongly condemned the brutal murder of Sukkur based journalist Ajay Laalwani who was shot dead in Sukkur earlier this week. The President PFUJ, Shahzada Zulfiqar, and Secretary, General Nasir Zaidi, while condemning the murder said that brutalities, high handedness and harassment against the journalist community is on a sharp rise in all the provinces, but Sindh where the PPP is ruling since 2008, has failed to take action against crimes against journalists, which is unfortunate and unprecedented. They demanded immediate arrest of the killers of the innocent journalists and demanded stringent security for journalists and media workers in Sindh and other provinces, as it is responsibility of federal and provincial governments to safeguard their lives.

In a related development, the New York city-based-Committee to Protect Journalists condemned Lalwani’s murder and demanded the culprits to be brought to justice. “Police in Sindh province must waste no time in investigating the Lalwani’s killing and apprehending those responsible,” said Steven Butler, CPJ’s Asia program coordinator. “It’s critical that the investigation be led by officers who are able to maintain public confidence, given the long history of tensions between local journalists and the police in Sukkur.” The CPJ considers Pakistan as a deadly country for journalists. In 2020, Pakistan ranked ninth on CPJ’s annual Global Impunity Index with 15 unsolved murders.

Newspaper: The News

Journalist Absar Alam challenges FIA summon

ISLAMABAD: Senior journalist and former chairman Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) Absar Alam has challenged a summon issued to him by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) over his recent tweets and social media posts.

Mr Alam in some of his recent tweets criticised the establishment for interfering in politics.

The FIA summoned him on a complaint filed by a lawyer who accused him of anti-state rhetoric.

He, however, challenged the summon in the Islamabad High Court (IHC). In a petition, he contended that the FIA summoned him without providing details of the complaint.

He said the summon was issued even after the date on which he was supposed to appear before the investigation officer.

He termed the summon mala fide and requested the court to scrap it.

Newspaper: Dawn , Business Recorder  

Swat Press Club expressed concern over a series of FIR registered against journalists

Swat Press Club on Tuesday expressed grave concern over a series of FIR registered against journalists working in Swat Valley and demanded their withdrawal.

According to details, a meeting of Swat Press club, Swat Union of Journalists and Electronic Media Association was held in press club here on Tuesday, where a large number of Journalists were present.

“The Swat Press Club (SPC) members showed grave concern over the registration of FIR that has been filed against journalists.

An FIR was registered under sections 500,506, and 25 D against the General Secretary Swat Press Club and Correspondent of 24 News Subhanullah, Sheraz Khan of Express News, and Muhammad Zubair of Geo News.

During the meeting, a senior journalist and President All Malakand Union of Journalist Shahzad Alam said that a fake and false case has been registered against three Swat based working journalists.

Police registered FIR without any investigation about the reality while in this connection the police role was totally found suspect. He further said that Swat Press Club stands in solidarity with all members of the fraternity. Later on a group of senior journalists visit and meets DIG Malakand Abdul Ghafoor Afiridi about the incident and he orders to police official to investigate the matter on merit.

Website: Lead Pakistan