PPF demands to access journalist in Papua, Indonesia

Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) in a letter to JokoWidodo, President of Indonesia expressed serious concern over more cases of violence against journalists in Papua and remains restricted for foreign journalists to enter the province.

PPF Secretary General Owais Aslam Ali in his letter demanded to honor your promise to allow local and international media access to Papua and urged your government to immediately drop the charges and stop violence against journalists.

According to Alliance of Independent Journalists (AIJ), on May 1, police assaulted Yance Wenda, a local journalist who works for Jubi daily and tabloidjubi.com in Jayapura, Papua, for covering the arrest of activists of the West Papua National Committee (KNPB).

On April 28, three television journalists from Metro TV, Jaya TV and TVRI experienced intimidation during covering a trial in Wamena District Court. An unknown group of visitors surrounded them, questioning and threatening them to delete their footage of the trial. Police observed the incident but didn’t intervene.

Government blocked news sites that are critical of the government, and foreign journalists are banned from traveling freely throughout the region.

Government should enforce protection of journalists under Press Law No.4/1999 across the archipelago, especially in Papua.

 

Regulating social media

The arrival of the internet is, no doubt, the most defining moment in our history. Social media tools, including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and WhatsApp, have become powerful instruments to play a prominent role in fuelling social change – both negative and positive.

Digital technology and social media had facilitated Obama’s presidential election campaign.  It also had a significant role to play in the Arab Spring. Today, all organisations, including the traditional media, are utilising the internet and social media. All national and international newspapers are available in the form of e-papers. Television channels are offering livestreaming options and mobile apps on their respective websites to attract more viewership.

Being active on social media is considered to be a social marker for everyone, regardless of whether they belong to the ruling class or the common citizenry. On the other hand, the widespread use of social media has given rise to a number of serious concerns – especially in developing countries like Pakistan – about the authentication of information. If you search for a renowned personality or celebrity on Facebook or Twitter, many results will appear. It will be difficult to identify which account is real and can be relied upon.

A worrisome situation occurs when baseless statements are attributed to such fake accounts and garner the attention of the traditional media. Frequent complaints about the character assassination of political rivals by paid social media cells are also on the rise. A political party is allegedly involved in promoting the misuse of social media in Pakistan.

Fake Twitter followers and spam accounts seem to be a growing problem and are being used to make trending topics more popular than they actually are. Moreover, fake photos and video clips that posted on social media platforms after any major natural disaster or accident quickly tend go viral. Situations such as the rise of blasphemous content and unjustified propaganda against the armed forces and judiciary occurs are particularly alarming for all of those who want to positively utilise social media.

To encourage the positive use of social media, the presence of fake accounts must be discouraged There was a time when telephone users received dozens of calls from wrong numbers on a daily basis. The introduction of the caller line identity (CLI) facility played a pivotal role in dealing with this problem. A similar identification mechanism is needed for social media as well.

Committing defamation by maliciously spreading false and fabricated information is considered to be anti-social activity throughout the world. Many anonymous websites have been blocked in the UAE while online activities which target another state are described as “electronic warfare”. Parents are advised to keep an eye on their children to inform them about the potential risks of misusing social media.

The situation in our country is quite sensitive. Every second anonymous website or social media account is actively involved in spreading one-sided propaganda and conspiracy theories while ideological conflicts among different countries are being intensified on the digital front of Pakistan. A serious issue involves the use of immoral language against opponents. Strengthening the role of the editor of news websites is also in the best interest of bloggers as it will help them win the trust of their readership by providing authentic news content.

A nationwide awareness campaign is required to highlight the importance of using social media for the betterment of society. We can also draw upon religious teachings to put the message across. Internet users must understand that they are accountable to God for all deeds while using the internet. They must realise that sharing of fake information is akin to committing a sin.

Now when the biometric verification of all SIMs has been completed throughout the country, there is a need to devise a mechanism whereby internet users will only be able to use social media after registering their mobile numbers. This has been observed at the airport in London where a local mobile phone number is required to enjoy free Wi-Fi. Biometric-verified mobile number will ensure that social media is used in a positive manner as the internet user will fear being caught for abusing regulations. This will also prevent various social evils related to terrorism and online fraud.

Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar deserves appreciation for his efforts to ensure the positive use of social media. While the incumbent government is committed to regulating social media, it is also the responsibility of all segments of society to ensure the successful implementation of regulations.

The News

SC directs high court to settle PBA plea by June 5

The Supreme Court on Thursday heard appeals filed by the Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) against the directives issued by Pemra regarding dramas, morning shows, advertisements and Ramazan transmissions.

IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui had, through an order on March 17, appointed a committee comprising the secretary Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, chairman and DG Technical Pemra, Additional Attorney General Afnan Karim Kundi and journalist Ansar Abbas to submit a report on the contents of TV shows, dramas and advertisements.

PBA counsel Barrister Syed Ali Zafar argued that the directions had been issued as a result of various orders passed by the high court. He contended that the high court does not have jurisdiction, under Article 199 of the Constitution, to act as a regulator of broadcast media content; and under the Pemra Ordinance 2002, it is only Pemra which has been designated as the regulator.

The counsel pointed out that under the Pemra Ordinance, the high court is the appellate authority and if a judge starts acting as the regulator then the provision of appeal provided in the law is totally negated.

He further submitted that a judge may have personal views about the culture and may even be against entertainment or may have his own religious views, but he is to leave all such personal opinions at home when he adorns the gown of a judge and sits in court.

While acting as a high court judge, no one can impose his views on what content is to be broadcast and when and how the media should air its shows, said Barrister Zafar and pointed out that a Code of Conduct 2015 had been voluntarily agreed upon between Pemra and the PBA, under the auspices of the apex court.

He contended that Pemra had breached the Code of Conduct 2015 and issued regulations to control and censor the media in contravention of fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution, particularly under Articles 19 and 19A.

The two-member bench then asked if anyone was present from the side of the respondents and called Pemra Chairman Absar Alam, who claimed that he was coincidentally present there.

The Supreme Court, after hearing the parties, decided that there are genuine grievances put forth by the PBA, and directed the high court to decide the grievances on Monday, June 5. The court also directed Pemra that until such time, no adverse action shall be taken against the TV channels.

Pemra barred from action against channels until court order

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday remanded the petition of Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) to Islamabad High Court (IHC) with the direction to decide the case after hearing the parties concerned.

A two-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan heard the PBA petition challenging the IHC order authorising the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) to censor TV content including dramas and commercials.

On March 17, IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui appointed a committee under Pemra with the task to examine the contents of TV shows, dramas and advertisements.

Barrister Syed Ali Zafar on behalf of PBA filed petitions in top court stating that the Pemra could not act as monitoring police and impose as how channels should broadcast their programmes under the law.

On Wednesday the court ordered the IHC Registrar to fix the instant matter within three days besides ruling that until the decision of the court, Pemra should not take any action against any TV channel.

Pemra Chairman Absar Alam submitted before the court that code of conduct was specifically made for Ramazan in response to the complaints lodged by the public. He said that it was requested that game shows and other programmes should not be telecast during Iftar and Tarawee hours.

Meanwhile, the court ruled that it did not want to interfere in the interim order, passed by the learned High Court but the instant matter was being remanded to the IHC with the direction to decide it on merits after hearing the parties.

In its petition, the PBA had raised objections arguing that the Pemra had no power or jurisdiction under the Constitution to become a regulator of the TV programmes.

The News

Activist held in first case about ‘maligning forces’ on social media

LAHORE: The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) arrested an activist in the first case in its campaign to crack down on social media users criticising the country’s armed forces on different digital platforms.

The FIA’s cybercrime wing arrested Adnan Afzal Qureshi in the Defence Housing Authority on Tuesday and charged him under Sections 20 and 24 of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (harming the reputation of a person and cyber stalking), and Sections 419 and 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code (impersonation and defamation).

“We arrested the activist for [posting] a series of anti-military tweets and running a Facebook page containing such content. The suspect used abusive language against some military personnel and political leaders. We are interrogating him to know whether he is part of a group that has launched an anti-military campaign or whether he is doing it on his own,” FIA investigator Rizwan Arshad told Dawn.

To a question about further arrests in this regard, he said: “We have identified more suspects and will take them into custody in the coming days,” he said.

Earlier, the FIA had interrogated over a dozen people suspected of running an anti-military campaign. They were released after the FIA could not establish anything serious against them. “This is the first FIR in a crackdown on the anti-military campaign on social media networks,” Mr Arshad said.

The crackdown was launched two weeks ago on the orders of Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, who took notice of criticism against the armed forces following a tweet by the Inter-Services Public Relations rejecting a government notification in connection with a story published in Dawn. Since then, forensic teams of the FIA’s cybercrime wing have been combing Facebook accounts, various WhatsApp groups, blogs and websites suspected of carrying such material.

Major opposition parties have vowed to resist the attempt to place curbs on social media.

Dawn

Related Stories

Dawn

Slain journalist Saleem Shahzad’s family lost the hope for Justice

KARACHI, May 30: “We have no hope and faith on police and government as they are not serious in providing justice as no progress has been made in the case in fact “they” neglected the commission’s recommendations” says Anita, widow of slain journalist Saleem Shahzad.

On May 29, 2011, Shahzad was picked up from federal capital while on his way to appear in television talk show to discuss his investigative report on Mehran Naval base attack, published on May 27, 2011 and his dead body with visible torture marks was found about 150 Kilo Meters away from Islamabad, floating in a canal in the limits of Saddar Police Station district Mandi Bahauddin, Punjab province, on 30th May.

Shahzad leaves behind his widow and three children, two sons and a daughter. Shahzad, an Islamabad based journalist, Bureau Chief of “Asia Times Online” (a Hong Kong-based news website), and South Asia Correspondent for Italian news agency Adnkronos International (AKI) in Pakistan.

Hamza Ameer, Shahzad’s brother in law and the correspondent of Turkish Radio and Television, who is pursuing the case, regretted that even after six years of Shahzad’s murder, neither the aggressors apprehended nor the recommendations of an inquiry commission formed to probe the incident have been implemented.

Ameer told Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) that he is disappointed at the lack of progress in the investigation and said today we are commemorating his death anniversary but journalists and NGOs have forgotten his brutal murder. “Police have gravely neglected the investigation and every new appointed Station House Officer of Saddar Police station Mandi Bahauddin used to make phone calls to me and asking about updates and clue of accused  in Shahzad case but since last two years it has been stopped as well” he added

According to media reports on October 17, 2010 Shahzad was called upon for meeting by state intelligence agency officials at Islamabad headquarters regarding his report “Pakistan frees Taliban commander”, published a day before in Asia Times Online. He had received multiple life threats including state agency.

In its concluding remarks, the commission report said that Shahzad’s death should be examined in the context of the “war on terror”. “The Pakistani state, the non-state actors such as the Taliban and al Qaeda, and foreign actors” could all have had a motive to commit the crime.

But “the commission has been unable to identify the culprits”, it said. The Commission has also admitted in its report that “in our present circumstances, investigating criminal allegations against security agencies is a rather difficult task”.

مقتول صحافی سلیم شہزاد کا خاندان انصاف سے ناامید

کراچی، 30 مئی: مقتول صحافی سلیم شہزاد کی بیوہ انیتا نے کہا ہے کہ “ہمیں پولیس اور حکومت سے کوئی امید ہے،  نہ ہی ان پر بھروسہ کیونکہ وہ انصاف کی فراہمی میں بالکل دلچسپی نہیں رکھتے اور نہ ہی مقدمے میں کوئی پیش رفت کی گئی ہے بلکہ درحقیقت “انہوں” نے کمیشن کی تجاویز کو بھی نظر انداز کردیا ہے۔”

29 مئی 2011ء کو سلیم شہزاد وفاقی دارالحکومت سے اس وقت اغوا کرلیے گئے تھے کہ جب وہ 27 مئی 2011ء کو مہران بیس حملے سے متعلق چھپنے والی اپنی تحقیقی رپورٹ کے بارے میں گفتگو کے لیے ایک ٹیلی وژن ٹاک شو میں شرکت کے لیے جارہے تھے۔ بعد ازاں 30 مئی کو ان کی تشدد زدہ لاش اسلام آباد سے 150 کلومیٹر دور ضلع منڈی بہاؤالدین، پنجاب کے صدر پولیس اسٹیشن کی حدود میں ایک نہر میں تیرتی ہوئی پائی گئی۔

سلیم شہزاد نے سوگواروں میں بیوہ اور تین بچے، دو بیٹے اور ایک بیٹی چھوڑی۔ اسلام آباد سے تعلق رکھنے والے سلیم شہزاد “ایشیا ٹائمز آن لائن” (ہانگ کانگ کی ایک خبری ویب سائٹ) کے بیورو چیف اور اطالوی خبررساں ادارے ادنکرونوس انٹرنیشنل (اے کے آئی) کے پاکستان میں جنوبی ایشیائی نامہ نگار تھے۔

مقدمے کی پیروی کرنے والے سلیم شہزاد کے برادر نسبتی اور ترک ریڈیو و ٹیلی ویژن کے نامہ نگار حمزہ امیر  نے افسوس کا اظہار کیا کہ سلیم شہزاد کے قتل کو چھ سال کا عرصہ گزرجانے کے باوجود اب تک قاتلوں کا پتہ چل سکا ہے، نہ ہی واقعے کی چھان بین کے لیے بنائے گئے تحقیقاتی کمیشن کی سفارش پر عمل درآمد ہوا ہے۔

حمزہ امیر نے پاکستان پریس فاؤنڈیشن (پی پی ایف) کو بتایا کہ وہ تحقیقات میں عدم پیش رفت پر سخت مایوس ہیں اور آج، ہم سلیم شہزاد کی برسی منارہے ہیں مگر صحافی اور این جی اوز اس ظالمانہ قتل کو فراموش کرچکے ہیں۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ پولیس نے تحقیقات کو مکمل نظر انداز کیا ہے اور صدر پولیس اسٹیشن منڈی بہاؤالدین میں تعینات ہونے والے ہر اسٹیشن ہاؤس آفیسر نے مجھے فون کرنے، پیش رفت دریافت کرنے اور ملزمان کا سراغ لگانے کے متعلق پوچھنے تک ہی اکتفا کیا مگر اب گزشتہ دو سالوں سے یہ سلسلہ بھی بند ہوچکا ہے۔

17 اکتوبر 2010ء کو ذرائع ابلاغ میں گردش کرنے والی رپورٹس کے مطابق سرکاری خفیہ ایجنسی کے حکام نے سلیم شہزاد کو اسلام آباد کے صدر دفتر میں ملاقات کے لیے طلب کیا تھا جس کا مقصد ایک روز قبل ایشیا ٹائمز آن لائن میں شائع ہونے والی رپورٹ “پاکستان نے طالبان کمانڈر کو رہا کردیا” سے متعلق بات چیت کرنا تھی۔ انہیں جان سے ماردینے کی متعدد دھمکیاں بھی موصول ہوچکی تھیں جس کے پیچھے (مبینہ طور پر) خفیہ ادارے بھی شامل تھے۔

کمیشن رپورٹ کے اختتامی ریمارکس میں کہا گیا ہے کہ سلیم شہزاد کی موت کو “دہشت گردی کے خلاف جنگ” کے تناظر میں پرکھا جانا چاہیے۔ “ریاست پاکستان، غیر ریاستی عناصر جیسا کہ طالبان اور القاعدہ، اور بیرونی عناصر” سب ہی کے پاس اس جرم کے ارتکاب کا ایک مقصد موجود ہے۔

مزید کہا گیا ہے کہ تاہم “کمیشن مجرمان کی شناخت کرنے سے قاصر ہے”۔ کمیشن نے اپنی رپورٹ میں یہ بھی اعتراف کیا ہے کہ “موجودہ صورتحال میں سیکورٹی ایجنسیوں کے خلاف مجرمانہ الزامات کی تحقیقات ایک کٹھن  کام ہے”۔

Translation in English