NA body seeks proposals to help families of slain journalists

NA body seeks proposals to help families of slain journalists

ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly standing committee on information and broadcasting on Tuesday directed the ministry to prepare proposals for the allocation of funds to help the families of journalists who lost their lives in the line of duty. The meeting of the committee was presided over by Marvi Memon.

Secretary Information Mohammad Azam informed the meeting that the ministry was planning to work on a proposal to allocate Rs200 million for the families of the journalists who received injuries or were killed in the line of duty.

“The government has not paid a single penny to the families of the journalists who were killed or injured while performing their duties,” the secretary said in reply to a question by Ms Memon. The members expressed concerns over the role of the ministry which they said had failed to compensate the families of the victims.

Mr Azam said the government had already abolished the secret fund which was also used to support the journalists’ community to overcome their health-related issues in the past.

Secretary information says no compensation has been paid so far to families of mediapersons

“We have a proposal for the allocation of funds in this regard and have already discussed it with the government’s financial adviser to process in this regard,” he added.

Ms Memon directed the officials to finalise the proposals as soon as possible, adding the committee would fully support the proposals.

On Monday, the secretary had also informed the Senate standing committee on information and broadcasting that the ministry had already forward a summary to the ministry of finance to allocate Rs200 million for this purpose.

The secretary told the NA committee that the ministry was also planning to arrange workshops for journalists working in conflict zones.

“We have allocated Rs100 million for the training of journalists covering development activities. The mediapersons will be trained on the standards of economic reporting,” he added. Ms Memon later said a separate meeting would be convened to discuss issues related to the rating system of private TV channels.

The committee directed the ministry to improve the quality of press releases being issued by the Press Information Department (PID) and its regional offices.

It also recommended deputing more cameramen/reporters on the foreign visits of the prime minister.

Iqbal Khattak, a Peshawar-based senior journalist and media safety expert, told Dawn that nine mediapersons and four assistants attached with different media organisations lost their lives so far in the current year.

“It is unfortunate that the government has failed to allocate funds at the federal level for the families of the journalists who were killed in the line of duty.”

He said the government provided financial support to the families of the police and military personnel who lost their lives in the line of duty.

“The government is not serious in punishing the killers of the journalists. The culprits target journalists due to the slim chances of being convicted and punished,” he said.

Mr Khattak demanded the government establish a special public prosecutor to investigate and proceed against the attackers on journalists across the country.

DAWN

The post NA body seeks proposals to help families of slain journalists appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).

How serious are Imran’s allegations against journalists?

How serious are Imran’s allegations against journalists?

KARACHI: The allegations of corruption against journalists are not new in this country. Political parties and successive governments have never been happy with this community. But such accusations, if they come from the national leaders like Imran Khan, they damage their credibility. So the accusations must be probed and Imran should come out with evidence, and it’s better for him not to rely on unreliable people.

Imran Khan is the most prominent opposition leader who not once but repeatedly have branded anchors, columnists, analysts and even media houses as “saleable property”. Therefore, it should not go unnoticed.

In today’s competitive world of media, allegations should not be rejected without a proper probe but the burden of truth always should be on the accuser. Journalists in the past and even today have been accused of taking “bribe and favour”. Accusations are no more confined to the government and agencies but also to other “interested parties”.

Complete polarisation of the media has not only divided the journalist fraternity but they have also been criticised for their “biases”.Late Justice (retd) Dorab Patel once said about the media: “You are under obligation not to distort the truth. But what is the truth? Ask the governor, two thousand years ago, and that question has never been answered, because our conception of truth is affected by our biases. So, the obligation on the journalists is to try to be as objective as possible.”

The Press need freedom not as a right but in discharge of its obligation in a free society to expose possible wrongdoings, particularly of the governments and corruption in other institutions, including within the media.

Justice Patel further said: “I think the power of the Press will increase and it will become stronger to the extent to which you are moderate in your language and to the extent you discharge your duty of verifying to the best of your ability the facts before you publish them.”

The same standard stands for political leaders who are supposed to lead the nation. How can you accuse a community without having any evidence?Imran, who is also the Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, by attacking the journalists without naming as who has taken the money and from where, has endangered their lives as they can come under attack by his ‘motivated’ workers. In a way, he has presented his ‘concept’ of Press Freedom, which may mean “no dissent is acceptable”.

Both Benazir Bhutto and Mian Nawaz Sharif, when in the opposition, had also accused journalists of taking money from the government of the day. Journalists were also accused of working on the payroll of intelligence agencies. However, when they came to power and were asked to disclose the names of journalists who had been paid from the secret funds or through other means, they just ignored it.

Imran Khan must make a public commitment that when his party comes to power he will order an independent high powered commission to probe his allegations, release the list of all those on payroll or paid from different accounts. The commission should also suggest punishment but, at the same time, if his accusations are found untrue, the same recommendations should also be for the accusers.

He should also make a public commitment that when his party comes to power, he will release the list of journalists on payroll of intelligence agencies. Journalist bodies like the PFUJ have been demanding this for decades. So let the leader of ‘Naya Pakistan’ make a public commitment.

Perhaps, the PTI chairman was not aware of the fact that it was due to the efforts of journalists that the secret fund of the Ministry of Information was abolished. Thanks to the efforts of Mr Hamid Mir and Mr Absar Alam’s petition in which some other journalists and anchors also became a party, the SC took up the matter, which is still pending for the final order.

Imran may also not be aware of our efforts to eradicate corruption from the media, as we take it more seriously than politicians because it’s a question of our credibility. Besides politicians, many untrustworthy people in the media industry also labelled such allegations without any evidence. Thus, it was due to our efforts that the Supreme Court had formed two members Media Commission comprising Justice (retd) Nasir Aslam Zahid and former Information Minister Javed Jabbar.

I advise Imran and PTI leaders to just go through the Media Commission report which is now also available in book form.Imran and his party can go to the SC and become a party in the same petition. If they have evidence against the journalists, anchors, columnists and analysts, they should submit the same before the court.

If nothing else, Imran should ask people like former information minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, former intelligence chiefs, some of whom at times were seen on his container, to disclose the names of journalists, anchors, columnists and analysts whom they had ‘paid’ in their tenure and for what purpose. How much money they had spent on journalists from the secret funds?

After all, people like Sheikh Rasheed in the past had remained the spokesman of Mian Nawaz Sharif and General (retd) Pervez Musharraf. Sheikh Saheb must have the knowledge of how the secret funds were used since the days of General Ziaul Haq. Who knows better than him how funds were used to build a leader’s image.

Perhaps, the PTI and Imran Khan want that everyone should praise them, support them and don’t ask critical questions.Imran has the right to praise any anchor or columnist and one must respect his views, but at the same time he should also learn to respect and praise “dissenting voices” in the media. Only a few days back, I got a chance to meet the PTI spokesperson and former editor of an English daily, Ms Shireen Mazari in a media workshop. She was right when she said, “Journalists have every right to form their own opinions and views about us, but our only request would be that they should also take our version as well.” I endorsed her view and said, “You have every right to give your version.”

She also assured complete protection and safety of journalists, particularly those from Geo TV, in PTI rallies and in Dharna. “I will make sure that the media should not have any complaint in future.” But, only hours later, Geo’s DSNG van was attacked and its reporters were harassed.

She had even assured the journalists that she would talk to Imran over his verbal accusations and attack on the media persons from the Dharna container. But after what we have been hearing from the PTI chairman in the last two public meetings against the media, I wonder whether Ms Mazari was able to convince her leader or not.

Actions speak louder than words. One expects from Imran Khan that if he wants to malign the journalists, anchors, columnists, analysts and accuse them as “saleable”, justice demands that he should name them. After all he is leading a “Justice Party”. So let’s wait for Imran’s fresh attack on the media.

The News

The post How serious are Imran’s allegations against journalists? appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).

Journalist goes missing

Journalist goes missing

QUETTA: A journalist working for Pakistan Television and based in Dera Bugti went missing from Quetta last week.

Imam Bukhsh, who works for a news agency, told reporters that his nephew Manzoor Ahmed Bugti reached Quetta from Dera Bugti on Nov 6 and went missing the following day.

“Manzoor went somewhere in the car of a friend whom he had told that he would return in two hours. But he did not come back and since then his whereabouts are not known,” Mr Bukhsh said.

“His mobile phone remains switched off,” he said, adding that no-one had contacted them for ransom.

The Civil Lines police registered a case and an official said police were trying to trace Mr Manzoor.

DAWN

The post Journalist goes missing appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).

Call for legislation to protect journalists

Call for legislation to protect journalists

QUETTA: No law in the country explicitly deals with safety of journalists whereas such laws exist in countries like Mexico where special prosecutors are appointed to pursue the cases of slain journalists and provide legal assistance to media workers facing threats, according to experts.

At a seminar organised by the Pakistan Coalition on Media Safety here on Saturday Adnan Rehmat and Iqbal Khattak, representatives of the advocacy group, said a study had revealed that of the 622 journalists killed across the world between 2002 and 2014, as many as 110 belonged to Pakistan. Even then no effort was made to enact a law to deal with the matter.

They said the government had no mechanism to help it implement the UN Action Plan for Safety of Journalists.

They said media organisations had not adopted adequate security strategies, protocols and procedures to reduce the risks to which journalists were exposed.

They advised journalists to motivate legislators, political parties and parliamentary committees to introduce laws on safety of journalists.

Balochistan Minister for Information Abdul Raheem Ziaratwal said militant groups and criminal mafias which came into existence because of the Afghan war were involved in targeted killing of journalists.

Tahir Hussain of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said FIRs were registered under anti-terrorism laws against some Quetta journalists during the tenure of the previous provincial government and alleged that the present government was reluctant to withdraw the cases.

The senior vice-president of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, Saleem Shahid, said a majority of journalists killed in the country belonged to Baloch­istan but their employers did not even bother to pay compensation to their families.

DAWN

The post Call for legislation to protect journalists appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).

Boycott of Geo useless act, Hassan Nisar tells Imran

Boycott of Geo useless act, Hassan Nisar tells Imran

KARACHI: Senior analyst Hassan Nisar has said Imran Khan’s decision to boycott Geo TV was a useless act as he could not damage the channel, which is getting back to its original position gradually.

He said Geo was and is No 1 channel of the country. He said Jang was and is No 1 newspaper of the country. He was talking in Geo TV programme ‘Meray Mutabiq’. He said that all should take pride in the 75-year-old institution as the biggest media group of the country. He remarked that it was unjust to single out an organisation for maltreatment.

He said the comment that what could not be achieved in 60 years was achieved in 60 hours during the premier’s visit to China was a hoax. He said politicians stated that all was going right and a man like Dr Samar Mubarakmand said that an activity was futile as

fuel was the main problem. It depicted that all of them were befooling the nation, he remarked. He said the government had no credit to claim for reduction in oil prices, adding that the reduction was not at par with the international oil market, and in this the government committed corruption.

He said Zulfiqar Khosa was a thorough gentleman and was a person who had preserved his reputation which was a big achievement. He said Saad Rafique and Tahmina Daultana were given the task to win Khosa back and it was still to be seen what he decided. It is a test for Khosa, he said.

On the appointment of chief election commissioner, he said this office had been made a joke and a controversy and no man of integrity was ready to occupy it.He said he had been against Metro Bus Project from day one because the country lacked clean drinking water, food and then there was a law and order situation.

About the boycott of Geo TV by Imran Khan, he said that if he had agreed to it even to a least degree, he would have joined Imran in the boycott, but it was a futile activity and PTI chief could not damage the channel.

He said Geo TV was getting back to its original position. He said what Pakistan had other than a 75-year-old institution (Jang Group) which it should be proud of.He asked even if a mistake was committed by someone, it was unjust to put the outcome of someone’s lifelong hard work at stake. He said it was a great injustice to do so.

He said no one was born in the history of the sub-continent who had not been dubbed as Kaafir or traitor. He said from Allama Iqbal to the Quaid-e-Azam and from Sir Syed to Faiz Ahmed Faiz no one had been spared in this regard.

He said the country should be proud of its No 1 TV channel and No 1 newspaper. He said it (Jang Group) was the largest media group which had contributed the most to the country’s development. He said this group was as much for Imran Khan as for him, referring to the stance Imran had taken.

He said that Imran should have pointed out whatever weakness he saw in this Group instead of boycotting it.Host Maria Memon asked what discipline was, to which Hassan Nisar said it was about organising one’s life, lack of which was death. He said apocalypse will come the day the Sun flouts discipline. He said the society that didn’t have discipline would end.

The News

The post Boycott of Geo useless act, Hassan Nisar tells Imran appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).

Pakistani schools network observes anti-Malala day

Pakistani schools network observes anti-Malala day

ISLAMABAD: An association of Pakistani schools held an “I am not Malala” day on Monday, condemning young Nobel peace laureate Malala Yousafzai for what it called her support for controversial novelist Salman Rushdie.

Education campaigner Malala was shot in the head by the Taliban in October 2012 but recovered and went on to win this year’s Nobel peace prize.

The 17-year-old has been hailed around the world for standing up for girls’ rights to education, but the response to her in Pakistan has not been universally positive, with some seeing her as a “Western agent” on a mission to shame her country.

The All Pakistan Private Schools Federation last year barred its members from buying Malala’s memoir “I am Malala” because of what the group said was its “anti-Pakistan and anti-Islam content.“

Read more: Pakistani private schools ban Malala’s book

It said the book, written with British journalist Christina Lamb, was too sympathetic to British novelist Salman Rushdie.

Rushdie in 1989 became the target of an Iranian fatwa, or religious edict, calling for his murder for allegedly blaspheming Islam and the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) in his book The Satanic Verses.

Mirza Kashif Ali, the president of the schools’ federation, said in a statement it was “clear that Malala has nexus with Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasrin, and also has alignment with Salman Rushdie’s ideological club”.

“We severely condemned the chapter of the book in which Salman Rushdie’s book has been mentioned as freedom of expression by Malala while referring to father’s views,” Ali said.

He said walks, seminars and press conferences were held to highlight the “I am not Malala” day.

Bangladeshi author Nasrin was forced to flee her homeland in 1994 after radical Muslims accused her of blasphemy over her novel “Lajja” (Shame), in which a Hindu family is persecuted by Muslims.

Blasphemy is a sensitive issue in Pakistan also, where it can carry the death penalty.

Malala’s book describes her life under the Taliban’s brutal rule in northwest Pakistan’s Swat valley in the mid-2000s, hints at her ambition to enter Pakistani politics and even describes her father’s brief flirtation with Islamic fundamentalism as a youngster.

The book describes public floggings by the Taliban, their ban on television, dancing and music, and the family’s decision to flee Swat along with nearly one million others in 2009 amid heavy fighting between the militants and Pakistani troops.

Malala, who lives in Britain where she went for treatment after being shot, was jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in October alongside India’s 60-year-old Kailash Satyarthi for their championing of children’s rights.

DAWN

The post Pakistani schools network observes anti-Malala day appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).

More threats against Pakistan’s Hamid Mir

More threats against Pakistan’s Hamid Mir

The well-known and controversial Pakistani television talk show host Hamid Mir survived a murder attempt on April 19, even though he was hit with six bullets–two of which are still in his body. “I can move, I can walk and I can talk, but I am still undergoing physiotherapy and taking medication,” he emailed to a small group of associates, including CPJ, over the weekend.

But he was messaging for another reason. He says he is concerned because he received a new round of threats and denunciations related to his plans to attend an upcoming conference in Bangladesh of journalists, hosted by the Bangladeshi newspaper Prothom Alo. Under discussion will be the incidents of 1971, when Bangladesh began its break away from Pakistan, leading to a vicious and bloody secessionist war.

Mir angered his own government when, on November 5 in the Urdu-language Daily Jang newspaper he encouraged Pakistan to issue an official apology to Bangladesh over atrocities of 1971. That re-opened a wound from last year when, while in Bangladesh, he identified the “main culprits,” as he put it, of the bloodbath as a group of Pakistani army officers. “I never spoke against the Pakistan Army, I only mentioned the names of some books written by Pakistan Army officers who confessed atrocities,” Mir said in this weekend’s email message.

“A few hours after my visit to the Bangladesh High Commission some mysterious people dropped CDs containing hate material against me in offices of different newspapers. Many people started tweeting against me and saying ‘Hamid Mir is enemy of Pakistan and agent of Bangladesh,’” he wrote. The CDs contained archival footage of past programs in which he was critical of the government and the military’s policies in Bangladesh.

His concerns for his safety are not overwrought. Remember, this is a man who was targeted for death eight months ago because of his outspoken views. While Mir was still hospitalized, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif established a three-member judicial commission which was supposed to release its report on the murder attempt within three weeks. Six months have passed since that deadline, and there is no report.

The motive for the April shooting remains unclear, but it seems likely to have been linked to Mir’s criticism of Pakistani policy in Baluchistan province, the region bordering Iran and Afghanistan in the west. At the time, he had been critical of the disappearances of Baloch political activists, hitting the issue frequently on his TV programs. A battle between insurgents and counter-insurgents has been waging in Baluchistan for years, and it is playing out in ugly incidents perpetrated by many sides to the conflict.

The result of the April murder attempt: The very outspoken Mir admits to dialing back his on-air rhetorical tone: “I am very careful these days in TV shows, but even then I am getting threatening messages and facing another hate campaign.” For Mir, and his associates, there seems little recourse but to publicize this recent round of accusations in the hope that the publicity will head off another serious attack.

Committee to protect journalists

The post More threats against Pakistan’s Hamid Mir appeared first on Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).